Skip to content

Archive

Tag: Superior Court Judge

Andrew Paolo Napolitano the 62 year old American former Superior Court Judge and current political and senior judicial analyst, has published an article on Reason Magazine titled “Where Is The Outrage Over the Domestic Use of Drones? And where have all the Jeffersonians gone?” In the article Napolitano states “…what Jeffersonians are among us today? When drones take pictures of us on our private property and in our homes, and the government uses the photos as it wishes, what will we do about it? Jefferson understood that when the government assaults our privacy and dignity, it is the moral equivalent of violence against us. The folks who hear about this, who either laugh or groan, cannot find it humorous or boring that their every move will be monitored and photographed by the government. Don’t believe me that this is coming? The photos that the drones will take may be retained and used or even distributed to others in the government so long as the “recipient is reasonably perceived to have a specific, lawful governmental function” in requiring them. And for the first time since the Civil War, the federal government will deploy military personnel inside the United States and publicly acknowledge that it is deploying them “to collect information about U.S. persons.””

 

Inspired by Reason ow.ly/bzArK image source Gage Skidmore ow.ly/bzB0k

Johnny Reid "John" Edwards the 57 year old US former presidential candidate had refused to answer a series of questions under oath during a deposition relating to a privacy lawsuit between his former mistress and mother of his child Rielle Hunter, and a former campaign aide Andrew Young. Young had allegedly improperly obtained from her a reputed sex video tape involving Edwards. Edwards will now face questioning under the direct supervision of a Superior Court Judge to rule on the questioning fairness, and to decide on what may be released to the press. Hunter’s suit against Young is for the return of the video tape, however the issue of a witness’s right to refuse questions that unreasonably annoy or embarrass, and the medias right to report lay at the heart of the legal debate. Inspired by Ned Barnett ow.ly/4KADi image source Wikipedia ow.ly/4KAIB This should be grist for the media mill (May 6 2011)

Johnny Reid “John” Edwards the 57 year old US former presidential candidate had refused to answer a series of questions under oath during a deposition relating to a privacy lawsuit between his former mistress and mother of his child Rielle Hunter, and a former campaign aide Andrew Young. Young had allegedly improperly obtained from her a reputed sex video tape involving Edwards. Edwards will now face questioning under the direct supervision of a Superior Court Judge to rule on the questioning fairness, and to decide on what may be released to the press. Hunter’s suit against Young is for the return of the video tape, however the issue of a witness’s right to refuse questions that unreasonably annoy or embarrass, and the medias right to report lay at the heart of the legal debate.

 

Inspired by Ned Barnett ow.ly/4KADi image source Wikipedia ow.ly/4KAIB

Rss Feed Tweeter button Facebook button Technorati button Reddit button Myspace button Linkedin button Delicious button Digg button Flickr button Stumbleupon button Newsvine button Youtube button